An Office for Scientific Responsibility?

One of the ideas for improving political use of science and evidence that I suggest in the book is the creation of an Office for Scientific Responsibility. This would work rather like the Office for Budget Responsibility set up by George Osborne in 2010: it wouldn’t constrain ministers’ executive decisions directly, but if a policy is claimed as evidence-based, it would audit that evidence afterwards.

The aim is to make ministers think twice before claiming an evidence base that doesn’t exist. Evidence abuse needs to carry a political cost.

I’ve written a Comment is Free piece about this for the Guardian. There’s also a (mostly) thoughtful comment thread below.

As I say in the comments, this isn’t the only model that might work. An alternative would be to beef up the powers of the Science and Technology Select Committee, to give it a similar audit and “naming and shaming” function. It would need the power to force a minister criticised in one of its reports to account for his actions on the floor of the House of Commons. It’s too easy at the moment for the Government simply to ignore such criticism.

The National Audit Office is another body that might be well-placed to take on this function, perhaps through an ongoing relationship with the Science and Technology Committee. The Chief Scientific Adviser, however, is probably the wrong person to do this — he needs a relationship of trust with ministers that could be undermined by public criticism.

Also in the Guardian, Adam Smith’s Talking Science to Power continues with an excellent piece examining the representation of science in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

About markgfh

Mark Henderson is Head of Communications at the Wellcome Trust, a global charitable foundation dedicated to achieving extraordinary improvements in human and animal health by supporting the brightest minds in biomedical research and the medical humanities. The Geek Manifesto contains his personal views, not those of the Wellcome Trust. Before joining the Trust in January 2012, Mark was Science Editor of The Times, where he built a reputation as one of Britain's foremost science journalists and commentators. Mark's first book, 50 Genetics Ideas You Really Need to Know, was published in 2009 by Quercus
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to An Office for Scientific Responsibility?

  1. Kayla says:

    The CiF article no longer exists – according to the note on the page “This content has been removed as our copyright has expired.” – how long did you give them? Considering that the article went up on Friday and it is now Sunday!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s